中美英三国高校数据安全治理政策的比较研究——基于融合特征词与PMC指数模型的文本分析

A Comparative Study of Data Security Governance Policies in Universities in China, the United States, and the United Kingdom: Text Analysis Based on Fusion of Feature Words and PMC Index Model

  • 摘要: 高校数据安全治理是国家整体数据安全治理的重要组成部分。通过对比分析中美英三国12例高校数据安全治理政策样本,为我国高校数据安全治理政策的制定提供有益借鉴。首先,依靠融合特征词与PMC指数模型。借助文本挖掘抽取特征词,提炼出PMC指数模型的指标维度,并以此为依据构建模型,结合PMC指数计算结果和PMC曲面图对中美英三国12例高校数据安全治理的政策样本进行对比分析。其次,对比分析发现,中国高校数据安全治理政策的PMC指标值最高,均值为7.39,英国次之,均值为6.98,美国最末,均值为6.55;中美英三国在政策功能、政策操作性、政策评价与管理体系方面具有较强的共通性,而在政策类型、政策性质、政策内容、技术体系与运营体系上显现差异性。最后,提出政策建议:重构政策功能,创生“制约”之效; 完善技术体系,呈现“加工”之法; 再建运营体系,重构“治理”之态

     

    Abstract: University data security governance constitutes a critical component of national data security strategies. By comparing and analyzing 12 data security governance policies in universities in China, the United States, and the United Kingdom, this provides useful reference for the formulation of data security governance policies in universities in China. Firstly, relying on the fusion of feature words and PMC index model. By using text mining to extract feature words, the indicator dimensions of the PMC index model are extracted, and based on this, the model is constructed. Combining the calculation results of the PMC index and the PMC surface graph, a comparative analysis is conducted on 12 policy samples of data security governance in universities in China, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Secondly, through comparative analysis, it was found that the PMC index score of data security governance policies in Chinese universities is the highest, with an average of 7.39, followed by the UK with an average of 6.98, and the United States with an average of 6.55;The three countries of China, the United States, and the UK have strong commonalities in policy functions, policy operability, policy evaluation, and management systems, while there are differences in policy types, policy nature, policy content, technical systems, and operational systems. Finally, policy recommendations are proposed: to reconstruct policy functions and create a "restraining" effect; Improve the technical system and present the method of "processing"; Rebuild the operational system and restructure the state of 'governance'.

     

/

返回文章
返回